twitter 1. to utter a succession of small, tremulous sounds, as a bird. 2. to talk lightly and rapidly, esp. of trivial matters; chatter. 3. to tremble with excitement or the like; be in a flutter.
Having just been welcomed into the so-called blog jungle, friends are already challenging me to enter the wonderful and instantaneous world of Twitter.
As I defend in this blog, shrapnel may well substitute for the long-gone idea of the literary fragment as something that piercingly contends with the instant attraction of images. That’s also the idea behind the Beyond project. After all, I do think writing has to somehow condensate to the point at which it becomes again able to compete for our increasingly limited attention spans.
As such, Twitter seems only like the next logical step.
But just as Facebook suddenly started thriving again on the delusive instant gratification of knowing what your 937 friends have thought 5 minutes or two hours ago, also Twitter verges strangely on carrying our attention span into new depths of reduction.
Indeed, socially interesting as these phenomena are proving to be in substituting for earlier forms of human bonding, text becomes here even less than a fragment or a piece of shrapnel. As Barthes would remind us: text becomes merely a caption. A caption for images, for events, for links, for our latest trivial flutters.
the fact that you would quote a line from a Bob Dylan song is enough to find my attention, but I know the hour is short. The new architecture I have seen arise, with all it’s reason for nature, has given me a new arise. My friend, IF you are of this same accord, then we are indeed brothers. Ed Hines
Pingback: On resistance: a confession… « shrapnel contemporary
Pingback: Beyond the Digital Turn « shrapnel contemporary
Pingback: Volume » Blog Archive » Beyond the Digital Turn
Pingback: Volume